API Development
APIs designed as products: versioned, documented, predictable under failure, and pleasant enough that integrators do not open a support ticket.
Explore this serviceFrontends get rewritten every few years. The data model outlives all of them. We build Node.js backends where the database enforces the invariants, the boundaries are typed, and the system tells you what it is doing before you have to guess.
Almost every serious production incident traces back to one of three things: data that should never have been allowed into that state, a boundary that was not validated, or a system that could not tell you what it was doing. All three are decided early and cheaply.
Foreign keys, unique constraints, check constraints, and the right transaction boundaries. If an invariant matters, it belongs where it cannot be bypassed — not in a service method someone will forget to call. Migrations are versioned, reversible, and reviewed like code, because they are.
Every input crossing a boundary is validated against a schema, and that same schema generates the types the application uses. There is one definition of what a valid request looks like, so the validator and the type can never disagree.
The situations teams are usually in when they bring us this problem.
Orphaned rows and impossible states because the constraints only exist in application code. We move them into the schema.
No retries, no dead-letter queue, no alert. Work disappears and nobody finds out until a customer does.
No traces, no metrics, no useful logs — so every incident is archaeology. Observability is part of the build.
The same sequence on every engagement, so there are no surprises in week three.
Entities, relationships, and the invariants that must always hold. This is the decision everything else inherits.
Schema-validated inputs, typed outputs, explicit error shapes. Nothing untrusted reaches business logic unchecked.
Services shipped with logs, metrics and traces from the first deploy — added later, they never get added.
Load tests against realistic traffic, with the slow query log read rather than assumed. Indexes follow evidence.
Concrete deliverables — all of it yours to keep, run, and hand to another team.
A documented relational model with constraints, indexes, and reversible migrations.
Business logic behind validated boundaries, with the API layer kept thin.
Queues, retries, idempotency keys, and a dead-letter queue with tooling to replay it.
Structured logging, error tracking, metrics and traces, wired to alerts that mean something.
What to do when it breaks, written before it breaks, by the people who built it.
Chosen for the problem, not for novelty.
We are not tied to any of these. If your team already runs something that works, we build with it.
Fastify over Express for schema-first validation and the performance headroom that comes with it.
Postgres, because most data is relational and pretending otherwise is a decision you pay for later.
Reproducible environments and traces that cross service boundaries — the two things you want during an incident.
The questions that come up in almost every first conversation.
Because one language across the stack means one set of types, one validation library, and shared code between the API and the web app. If your problem is genuinely CPU-bound or your team is already strong elsewhere, we will say so.
Yes. Typically we start by adding validation at the boundaries and observability inside, which makes the real problems visible before anyone commits to changing them.
Only when there is a reason — team boundaries or genuinely divergent scaling. A well-structured monolith with clear internal boundaries beats a distributed one for most companies.
Bring the problem, not a spec. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right team and outline a concrete first step — no obligation, no sales theatre.